I continue to be amazed with how rarely anyone will attribute any significant part of the rise in demand to the gargantuan fuel consumption of the U.S. invasions and occupations of Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Somalia.
Read any day’s air power report (which only covers the Air Force’s fixed-wing planes, not Army and Marine helicopters). The last item is always some millions of pounds of fuel delivered.
Every day. Just for the planes.
and you know, i never ever figured this out for myself. so, i did, in my inestimable rough-guess-kinda-way, and here it is, with links for the numbers, and some corrections.
how much gas do we use. first, a chart.

yes! we use about 10% more gas in a day than all the rest of the world put together. scary!
[and wrong. oops! we use more than the next 20 biggest users. we use "only" 44% of the total total.]
we use about 400 million gallons of gas a day. we use another roughly 110 million gallons of diesel.* a gallon of gas weighs about 6 lbs; gallon of diesel, about 7 lbs.* so that’s — carry the 3 — 3,100 million pounds a day.
we’re talking about jets. let’s add commercial jet fuel. about 57 million gallons a day. average of 6 lbs/gal. 342 million lbs.
let’s just make it 3,400 million pounds per day.
ok, now i get to look at how many pounds are in the military report. ta-da! 2.8 million pounds. less than 0.1%.
so, yeah, in conclusion, the US military is a blip in the juggernaut of american ecological destruction.
these are, i grant you, big numbers, and no matter what answers we pick for getting rid of this fuel, it will be a big project. still gotta do it!
ps. if you clicked through to the economist blurb about the chart, you saw this:
[it's] easy to see why George Bush has introduced a plan to cut petrol consumption by 20% in the next ten years.
i can count the ways for you that spurious george is pushing horseshit — but isn’t it enough that most of the reduction comes from a 1:1 replacement with corn ethanol, the single worst biofuel known to science?
pps. don’t chinese fuel use increases reduce the importance of our pollution output? that depends. with so many central americans fleeing NAFTA into our country, does that mean we get to beat up gay people?
ppps. the magic word for today’s show? “specific gravity!” that’s right.
mar 14. more of that conversation:
BaronMarius: Klare had an earlier article called “The Pentagon as Global Gas Guzzler“
hapa: ok so klare’s high estimate of use is 340,000 barrels of oil. on its own a barrel is 42 gallons, but after processing, it comes out to about 44. so that’d mean the pentagon is using 15 million gallons a day.
(what that really is that the pentagon uses 15 million gallons of petroleum products; it’s not direct barrels of oil, because many parts of a barrel of oil aren’t used for fuel, they can’t be. here we’re talking about barrels of oil sort of in equivalency.)
15 million. multiply that times the heaviest burnable product, 7 lbs, and you get 105 million pounds a day. so that gets us to 3% of what i figured, right. i don’t know how to find out how much that has changed.
at this point though we can start using some of the big numbers. for instance, US daily use of oil is 20 million barrels, or 880 million gallons, or as i’m figuring it, 6,160 million lbs. that brings pentagon use down to 1.7%.
however to be truly brutal here you have to add US coal and natural gas use which together we use more of for energy, than we do of oil, and the pentagon doesn’t use much of either, as far as i know. so if you’re talking about total fossil fuel use, the pentagon is probably under 1% of our footprint.
klare’s point in all these articles, and especially also this two parter (one two) is that the US military empowers the US domestic waste. “no blood for oil”, right? so really the pentagon’s footprint could be expanded to include almost our entire energy use, but we’re the ones who are doing the damage. they’re just our thugs.



ring ring ring