from a bbc interview, via:
well, that’s great, you’d rather live in a failed state than in a dictatorship, that’s your preference, that wouldn’t be my preference
let’s reword that.
well, that’s great, you’d rather live in a condemned building without clean water or access to doctors for your kids than in a mandatory public housing complex, that’s your preference, that wouldn’t be my preference
or
well, that’s great, you’d rather be raped and murdered by roving thugs than potentially jailed for dissent, that’s your preference, that wouldn’t be my preference
or
well, that’s great, you’d rather be forced into prostitution under a predatory warlord than not be able to own your own business, that’s your preference, that wouldn’t be my preference
it’s not that dear john has no sympathy for people trying to pass on their culture to the next generation — he believes in tradition — or that he necessarily believes suicide by cop extends to voting. bolton’s kid went to school here—
Located on 57 acres of rolling woodlands just off River Road, the campus encompasses seven buildings that house a new science wing and lecture hall, two libraries, a performing arts center with a 400-seat theater and new black box theater, art and ceramic studios and photo lab, three dance studios, a double gymnasium, an indoor competition-size pool, and a weight and training room. Outside, seven tennis courts, three athletic fields, and a new track round off the sports facilities.
— and if yours can’t, that’s your fucking preference.
ps. sometimes i pretend to be an anarchist. because of this, i know the difference between an equitable, peaceful horizontal arrangement and what’s euphemistically called a failed state — and i know that the latter takes a fair amount of external support to keep going — but from john’s perspective, eventually the ethnic cleansing ends, and that’s where you start taking credit.
mar 12. i think i blew this, trying to treat bolton’s generic comparison as he presented it. i took my example dictatorship far from saddam’s iraq, where both internal and external pressures created a very bad situation, particularly for those without strong ties to the government. the reason i did this was not because i was exaggerating life under saddam, but because i felt bolton was exaggerating the hardships experienced by people living in the former soviet union — the disbanding of which provided the template for the expectations of operation iraqi freedom’s near-term outcome.
wanna make sure it’s understood that i don’t think saddam’s government was a good government and i strongly wouldn’t have wanted to live under it in the majority, as second-class citizens — it was a long way down — a punishing life.
but my original sense still stands, which was, in answer to the perpetual implied question of, “don’t you think there was a chance for the ba’ath party’s forceful overthrow to lead to a better situation in the country?” — i still feel that no american administration could clearly deliver that — least of all one with ongoing financial ties to people and organizations that have sought to subvert popular rule in every other country they touched.
ring ring ring